DeletedUser2919
Guest
Rumour has it should be noted though that your summation might be a bit imprecise as to what I said.
Rumour has it... Allrighty then.
Since transativity comes into play it should be sufficient to demonstrate the following(which has already been demonstrated and wont be revisited beyond enumeration):
i) Consider alliance A, B and C on server S, and Δ the remaining alliances on server S.
ii) A has a covenant with B
iii) B has a covenant with C
iv) {A, B,C} is not at war with eachother.
v) {A, B, C} attacks the same elements in Δ.
vi) |{A, B, C}| is considerably larger then |Δ|.
Since all of the above the above applies to Chi it is thus proven that {Mupparne, Tog, GoM} ihjelpakter chi.
QED maffakkers!
Ryktas att du använder fancyga beteckningar, du måste vara helt sjukt intelligent! :O
Men håller inte med om det här:
to establish that {A, B, C} utilises a cooperation(from i-v) and ihjelpaktar S(from i-vi).
Vi har fortfarande Tog/BB som enda förbund, ett enda förbund är knappast en "ihjelpaktning". Vi i mupparna kan inte bestämma över vilka förbund Tog och Gom har.
Att ni skaffat Gom som fiender är väl inte vårt problem?